A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing new rules that restricted “Occupy Nashville” demonstrators’ ability to protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN).
“The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because it does not like how people are using a public space,” said ACLU-TN Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. “Today’s decision is the first step in restoring demonstrators’ free speech rights.”
The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power since October 9.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (56)
“We hope the fact that the State did not contest the temporary restraining order means that it is recommitting itself to safeguarding — not thwarting — public political expression,” said Hedy Weinberg, ACLU-TN Executive Director.
- 31 votes
This is an excellent piece of news! You have to hand it to OWS - they aren't letting intimidation tactics or attempted hijacking of their purpose stop them. They are staying on message and staying strong. Way to go, OWS!
- 26 votes
Ah, a judge who understands and knows how to read the law. Good on him. We need more like him to save our judicail system.
- 20 votes
The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power since October 9
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is the combination of state and corporate power." Mussolini
OWS struggle is same as that of our forefathers, fight against Fascism.
- 17 votes
If y'all think this will stop the pigs from beating on people y'all best think again. At the same time this ruling also gives people the right to defend themselves and fight back. Even against those who supposedly uphold and have interest in law and order. Namely those damn pigs who's own rights are in jeopardy yet they still side with those who would take their collective bargaining rights away. Now what kind of sense does that make? If the pigs keep this up We The People ought to separate the pigs along with federal politicians from firemen and teachers and let the political pigs chance it on their own. Corporate America thinks they have everyone they need in their pockets. Occupy needs to keep going at least through the 2012 election cycle to weed out the financial crooks and fools who are still taking down the economy. Namely Republicans.
- 7 votes
OWS struggle is same as that of our forefathers, fight against Fascism.
THis is the epitome of the problem
Boehner Hands Out Lobbyist Checks on House floor for subsidy vote
- 13 votes
Just like the night judge that refused for 3-4 nightsto sign off on arrest warrants which meant all the protesters had to go free. The attempted corporate police state is running into some trouble with the legal system who would of though it.
- 13 votes
An inspiring seed. It is sad that it took a judge to stop the attempts to stifle the American people. However, this is one excellent step into using our power as the people of our country to produce change. It works. The power of millions of people standing together cannot be stopped.
- 7 votes
It is sad that it took a judge to stop the attempts to stifle the American people.
It is indeed sad when we have to go to court to ensure the rights given to us by the Constitution are truly ours.
- 10 votes
I am not for or against the Occupiers, mostly because I am still unclear with what they want.
I saw a college student with a sign who wanted his student loans paid off for him on The Colbert Report, coulda been Jon Stewart, when asked why, the student didn't have a good reason, "its something I want" I believe was his response.
So can anyone explain it please?
- 1 vote
That is some good news, but it just goes to show that the freedoms we expect and call our rights don't come easy or freely. Never forget.
Fernando - does it really matter what they want? Just start with the fact that they wanted to assemble.
- 9 votes
Yes it does really matter. I 100% support their right to assemble, just like I would support the right of any group to assemble even the ones I think are douchebags (KKK, Nazi's, the group that pickets service members funerals, I dont like to mention their names, whomever). When there is no clear direction, who do we follow, and when there is no clear leadership, who do we hold accountable?
Remember to have your barf bags at the ready for when a conservative spouts that they're "strict constitutionalists".
- 6 votes
Lol fighting against fascism? So it's fascist that you don't get paid 100k per year for serving coffee at starbucks, in the spirit of "wage equality?
It's no one's problem but your own that you chose to major in Mayan farts from a private liberal arts college and are drowning in debt. You are not noble or victimized and you are not entitled to anything.
- 1 vote
fernando, I'm surprised that anyone still doesn't understand what the protesters are trying to do.
They are trying to force awareness of a situation that is turning our nation into a poverty state, which the media largely chooses to ignore. They're trying to put an end to the apathy of the average American who doesn't understand how the 99% is being exploited for the benefit of the 1%, and that as long as politicians cater to the wealthy, the exploitation will continue unabated.
They are trying to make people understand that the growing wealth disparity is NOT an indication of a healthy economic future, and that while no one may have a solution right now, it's time to start thinking about a solution because history has shown what happens to countries where the vast majority of the wealth becomes concentrated in very few hands.
I say good for them for trying to initiate much-needed change, and I challenge anyone to prove they are all nothing more than lazy, liberal free-loaders looking for handouts.
- 11 votes
How dare we protest corporations that make billions in profit, yet lay off thousands of people, just so executives can give them selves big fat bonuses. How dare we protest them spending hundreds of millions of dollars lobbying our government. Instead we should be on the ground washing their balls and kissing their feet because they are so important (and don't want to get laid off).
If anyone can't figure out that was sarcastic then they are friggen brain dead.
Company I work for is smaller, everyone took a raise freeze, gave up our profit sharing for a year, slashed our training budgets, slashed our technology budgets, because the company wasn't doing well with sales. However the executives all got their nice 20,000.00 bonus checks.
- 9 votes
No really just kidding, but let me explain what Silvaria means by wealth disparity is that there is a large group of people who are sitting on their duff and not doing anything to create their own wealth, and since Obama and company just keep handing it out it goes to those who want wealth, there fore income desparity happens. It is not that they cant have wealth it's just that they bought into the leftist view that they werent allowed to have wealth and the right wont let them.
As I requested in my previous post but you ignored, prove that everyone who is alarmed and disgusted by the ever-growing wealth disparity are just people who are looking for something for nothing.
And next time, an actual link may help.
- 4 votes
Heh...anyone besides me notice how these guys never come back and prove their blanket assertions?
Silvaria 1
swai 0
- 4 votes
Heh...anyone besides me notice how these guys never come back and prove their blanket assertions?
Yeah, hit and run.
- 1 vote
Nice. A judge who understands the right to gather and petition the government. There's been a creeping and constant use of ordinances and restrictions (protest "zones" for instance) over the last decade that has been eroding one of our most basic rights. Hopefully this is used in other cities as basis to win back similar freedom through the courts if necessary.
- 22 votes
Hopefully this is used in other cities as basis to win back similar freedom through the courts if necessary.
Indeed. Freedom to assemble is one of the big ones, and should be strongly guarded. I think this is a great win for all of us.
- 23 votes
Indeed. Freedom to assemble is one of the big ones, and should be strongly guarded. I think this is a great win for all of us.
It is a great win for all but for at least 99% of us, it is fantastic news. For the other 1% and those deluded enough that they think they will be there soon if they follow the r/tp mantra, it may not sound like such good news. If they open their eyes though, they may actually see that it will help them eventually, at least to the degree of keeping other liberties free from government mandate.
Regardless, this IS good news for us and for the constitution.
- 13 votes
That is what is happening. Our freedoms are being regulated to death, mostly by republicans who claim to hate regulations. lol. Voting ID regulations. Abortion regulations. Gun permits. I hate those "protest zones" eight blocks away from whatever. This guy is a real American.
- 12 votes
in nashville no less. interesting considering the other cities who claim to be more for the people and are beating protestors.
- 7 votes
I applaud the Judge's decision. Now how long till we hear the "activist judges" rants.
- 22 votes
Rygar
I applaud the Judge's decision. Now how long till we hear the "activist judges" rants
or him being a RINO
- 16 votes
By activist judges you mean those "Rent a Judges"?
About 7 minutes :D
- 12 votes
it seems i have waited these long decades since the 60's and 70's for Americans to take their freedoms seriously again...i was too young to take to the streets then, and am too disabled to now...i wish i could join these good folks, and may God bless them, and bless these United States of America !!!
luv,
ron
- 19 votes
Oooops!
I wonder how the attempts to circumvent constitutional rights will play out on election day.
- 9 votes
Hopefully, people will remember. Especially the people/protesters in the local voting blocks.
- 15 votes
If you have evidence of voter fraud due to a voter casting more than one ballot in an election, you should report it immediately.
If you do not have such evidence, your comment cannot be taken seriously.
- 26 votes
... liberals ... stuffing ballot boxes like they usually do.
WTF? You want to back that statement up with some facts, Gene?
Otherwise, don't waste our time with meaningless, bald assertions meant for no other purpose than to demean people with whom you do not agree.
- 14 votes
Of course he doesn't...
Anyone who has been around NV long enough to become familiar with MG know that he just likes to run his mouth in an attempt to keep up his "mean" guy image...
Just give him a few more posts and I'm sure he'll also let you know how awesome he his and how much more money he makes than you do... (but then he'll point out how those things aren't important either)
Aren't the interwebs great?
- 13 votes
Great news.... now to see this ruling applied across the Country.
- 8 votes
I am not surprised, as I have said before and I will say it again. You don't really stand up for the rights constituted under the First Amendment unless you know what it meant.
It is great to know that the existance of decent judicial system, both Federal and State still exists in this country.
- 7 votes
Wow, a Raw Story I can agree with. Not sure if that has happened before. I'm all for enforcing the rules in place at the time but you can't just make them up as you go because you don't like the outcome.
- 4 votes
Whoa--freedom of speech in America? That's a radical concept. The next thing you know, they will talk about restoring the Fairness In Media doctrine and wrest control of the airwaves from corporate spokespersons and talking heads--nah, that's never gonna happen.
Because in the U.S., the Supreme Court protects only the speech rights of the moneyed interests.
Can you say, "downward spiral?"
- 7 votes
Thank You Magistrate Judge Tom Nelson for not thwarting freedom to assemble and freedom of speech. At least someone is guarding our constitutional rights!!!
Good Seed, Mweaver
- 6 votes
As a Conservative... I respect the decision by the Judge...The law is the Law... Ya want to change the rules then change them in the light of day and legally!
I think the State can and should be able to change the rules.But, they need to do it LEGALLY!
- 3 votes
I think the State can and should be able to change the rules.But, they need to do it LEGALLY!
The Constitution, being a document of federal laws, supersedes State laws when it concerns individual rights. There is no way to get around personal freedoms or freedom of assembly.
- 11 votes
The Constitution, being a document of federal laws,
No the Constitution is not a document of laws....
It is a Document of restrictions on government powers... Its not about Laws...Its about restraint of government and explaining its limitations...and its responsibilities...
Its not Laws...Its the foundation of our Laws..
Which part of The 10th Amendment do you not agree with...
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Show me in the Constitution where this was specified as a power given to the Federal Government?
I'll wait... For you to provide where the Federal Government was Constitutionally given the ability to have total control over local permitting for rallies and protests...
- 2 votes
I'll wait... For you to provide where the Federal Government was Constitutionally given the ability to have total control over local permitting for rallies and protests...
That isn't what I spoke about at all. Show me where in my post where I said anything about rallies? Freedom of assembly isn't so mundane as that.
When will any of you self-proclaimed, all in bold, conservatives actually give a @!$%# about the freedoms you say you support?
- 9 votes
Good to hear. You can't keep changing the rules in the middle of the game.
- 5 votes
This is certainly a free speech victory. The message is clearly sent to the TN government that they cannot deny free speech simply because they disagree with it. GOTPers, take note because OWS isn't going away any time soon.
- 6 votes
Elect a Republican , and you will see more of our rights disappear. I hope people are paying attention on all the obsticles "occupy" groups are facing just to practice the right to assemble and freedom of speech. Be very carefull we don't loose these rights, from the evil right. I heard a report that the tea party congress is 25 million dollars richer since the last election of congressman. I guess the 1% power machine is pumping the money to get what they want. So, the 99 percent better get out an vote.
- 2 votes
saw this one comming. Good to hear the judge is an honest person. No way was that constitutional to all of a sudden adopt laws to restrict protestors to x days at x time because the city didnt like their message.
- 3 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



